Sacramento Standard

Senator Shannon Grove, representing Bakersfield, expressed disappointment after the Senate Education Committee voted 5-2 against SB 64, known as the California Education Flex Account Act of 2025. The bill aimed to address California's low educational ranking by allowing parents to choose schools that best meet their children's needs and ensure funding follows the student.

"Senate Bill 64 would have empowered families, not bureaucracies, and let the money follow the child," said Senator Grove. "The Senate Education Committee’s decision to kill SB 64 denies parents and students the chance to thrive in schools tailored to their needs."

California spends about $24,700 per student, which is above the national average. However, it ranks low in academic achievement for fourth and eighth graders. Many parents feel the current system inadequately prepares students for future endeavors.

Students of color face significant challenges in meeting grade-level standards in English Language Arts and Mathematics. Black and Hispanic students from low-income areas often perform better than peers in traditional public schools when given options. Notably, a significant percentage of top public high schools for low-income African American and Latino students are charter schools.

SB 64 proposed several initiatives:

- Individualized Flex Accounts: It would establish accounts providing $8,000 for tuition and education-related expenses and $16,000 for special needs students.

- Supporting Existing Public Schools: Local and federal funding would remain with public schools.

- Accountability and Accessibility: Ensures funds are used for accredited institutions.

Senator Grove emphasized that SB 64 aimed to give all families equal opportunities for quality education while supporting public schools' funding. Despite this setback, she remains committed to advocating for school choice in California.